When I thought this chapter would be the most easiest to write due to my field experience, it ended up to be the most complicated as I feel I really can't mess up this one. Everyone is a runner. We all ran at some point in our life, and when you talk about running, most of your friends will at least get the broad line of your training or time in that discipline. Yet, it's an incredibly complex sport when it comes to becoming competitive, because nowadays it requires many factors to match other competitors with recent developments around that sport, including :
In just a matter of 8 months, I managed to improve my marathon time from 3:30:00 to 2:57:16, joining the legendary #SUB3 club. More than that, that breakthrough helped me so much to believe in a #SUB10 performance. Yes, I didn't forgot to keep in sight the real prize. Running is the last part of a triathlon, and is of utter importance in an IronMan 140.6 when you have to deal with a 42-kilometre distance. I've read about so many triathletes ruining months and months of preparation by blowing up on the run and adding up one hour or more to their finish time by walking it down. It was never an option for me, before and during the marathon. Yes I could have faced an unexpected problem — we're not dealing with exact science there — but in normal conditions I knew it would indeed not be an option. Some are master at the walk / run strategy — and it's amazing to see actually when it's perfectly executed — but I will assume that most of us are just looking to be able to run it from A to Z.
If you read my #SUB10 journey chapter you should know that I will now focus on the run for a while, aiming in the long term for a 2:40:00 marathon time. Maybe one day I will dedicate another blog to that journey, who knows ?
For now, I will try to summarize the most effective tips and tricks that helped me to improve and deliver on the pavement.
I'm not a lucky guy when it comes to my legs and foot “configuration”. I have indeed to deal with flat feet and valgus deformity of the knee, not really helping when it comes down to running on a frequent basis. When I started 2 years ago, it took me some time to realise that I would keep being injured again and again until I take the time to deal with that problem. What a surprise it was when I went to a chiropodist dedicated to sport athletes and learnt about my troubles. He created me two pairs of shoe insoles, one for the run obviously, but one also for the bike as my knees were somehow hitting the frame from time to time due to their distortion. The moment I started to wear them, I started a serious injury free period that is still lasting.
Actually, talking a bit with him about my case, he acknowledged that 70% of runners are affected by legs and foot problems requiring shoe insoles ! So if you are actually facing pain and / or injuries from time to time when you're running, I guess that the first thing you should do is to have a chiropodist appointment.
Global warming is a thing. Past years have seen surge of temperatures and heat waves impacting strongly some IronMan events. 2019 was no exception with IronMan France being shortened and IronMan Frankfürt striking a new DNF record of 26% ! This is a real deal and I think that in the short to mid term the organisers will have no other choice than to move and adapt race dates to that new paradigm shift. Until that time, dealing with heat is something you'll have to learn if you want to achieve your dream, run being the most impacted.
Much studies1Impact of Environmental Parameters on Marathon Running Performance - Plos have been conducted over the past decade on the impact of temperature on the body during running, especially on the marathon. We're not entitled to a biology course, but I feel it's important to understand what's happening when we're ending up on a run course bathed by the heat. Whenever our body is facing high temperatures, the skin blood vessels will dilate, leading to increased blood flow to the skin so we're able to release heat. Problem is that — and it's the same for nutrition as we'll see later in the dedicated chapter — less blood is therefore available for the leg muscles. All things being equal, your heart rate will increase substantively and you won't be be able to run as fast as when it's cooler.
To define what a “high temperature” is for a marathon, consider that 10 degrees Celsius is the optimal target, while anything above 15 degrees Celsius will start to be at the expense of your performance. When the thermometer is raising to 25 degrees Celsius then you can expect your speed to be reduced by around 20% at that point. Yikes. So obviously when it comes to an IronMan marathon during the summer season straight in the middle of the day, we're all just pack animals trying to survive.
Yet some are doing better than others, and if you're struggling, maybe you're not ticking all those boxes :
Getting in a marathon after 3,800 metres of swim and 180 kilometres of bike is something very extreme, whatever the fitness level of any athlete. Putting on the shoes, we're all already very tired and at that point, and I can't stress how much your running technique can help to save the last gasp of energy you will need in the last part of the marathon.
Experienced runners should already have heard about that guy called Pete Riegel, former mechanical engineer and runner, who was the first one to theorize the relationship between exponential speed decline as a function of the distance.
For all the maths lovers around, the exact formula of the so called Riegel exponent being :
T2=T1×(D2÷D1)1.06
You're not that maths guy ? Me neither, so just keep in mind that as the distance increases by a factor of two, the speed decreases by 5%. This is pure physics, either for amateurs or world class runners.
But now comes the tricky part — wouldn't be fun otherwise — as the Riegel exponent is working fine for open running races, not really for triathlon. You just can't take your IronMan 70.3 half marathon time and use that formula for an IronMan 140.6 marathon, it's just pure utopia. A million variables can play a part after 7 hours or so of effort.
That's where your humble servant can play a part and give you some rule of thumb :
Again, bike fitness, nutrition, weather, pacing are so many variables varying from one athlete to another, but yep... I guess this is close from reality if you don't mess up too much your training preparation ahead of the race.
If you're — already — running with power, then it should be more easier to pace yourself, like for the bike. You can use this chart from the Palladino Power Project hinting for a 75% to 80% FTP range, which ended up being relatively accurate for me with a 81% FTP effort on my #SUB10 marathon at Challenge Almere-Amsterdam.
Research has shown2The Secret of Running - Hans Van Dijk & Ron Van Megen that world class runners — and what a demonstration of that did Eliud Kipchoge give at INEOS 1:59 Challenge — can reduce the air resistance due to their own wind by 20% with the use of pacemakers. That's something we don't have, clearly. Yet an average guy drafting on an open marathon can shave almost one minute of his time by running in a pack and overcoming slightly the 6% air resistance share of the total marathon effort.
We all at some point have gone through a run facing either a strong headwind or effective tailwind, or thinking we run faster on a treadmill due to the total lack of air resistance — we're going to discuss this soon enough. There is no reason it would be any different during any race.
Drafting is allowed on the IronMan 140.6 run, yet very hard to use effectively. On an open running race, you usually start within the gate of people close to your level, so from minute one you can just stick in the pack, or at least try. On a triathlon, people are not starting the run at the same time, and so it needs a little bit of time and / or luck to match with people running at your pace.
I can actually rely on that drafting effect as I did my best performance run at IronMan 70.3 Les Sables d'Olonne. The run course was on the waterfront, thus exposed to the wind. Getting on the first loop I got passed by pro triathlete female Anne Reischmann. Her pace was slightly better than mine by 5"/KM or around that, so I just offset that difference by sticking behind her and letting her deal with the pacing and the slight extra share of air resistance . We ran 14 kilometres together, until she turned to the finish line to claim a 1:29:47 half marathon and a second place on the pro women field ! I finished the last loop on my own, keeping the positive momentum, and clinched a 1:30:56 half marathon time !
Obviously this is something you can't get on demand, but if karma is good to you and you end up with that kind of situation, just don't let it slip it by !
People following me on my Instagram — free ad alright — are now used to my #NoVaporflyNoParty hashtag that I throw from time to time on my stories. The worldwide breakthrough that Eliud Kipchoge has done by beating the #SUB2 marathon mark in October 2019 has revealed what most experienced runners knew already : the Nike Vaporfly Next% confer an utterly big advantage compared to any other shoe on the market. Fact.
I'm absolutely fascinated by the evolution of that model since its first release over 2 years ago — I got my first model the day it was released — and how the whole thing is exactly working with its fibre carbon plate and springy midsole foam. To keep it short, the shoe doesn't make you go faster, and it felt good to see Adidas athlete Rhonex Kipruto breaking the 10 Kilometre World Record with other shoes. No, the Vaporfly is the sole reigning queen on the king distance : the marathon. Its very own design and technology are offering a significant gain in term of running economy over long distances, allowing for runners using it to run the 42.195 kilometres 4% to 5% faster than with any other shoes ! For someone running a 3:30:00 marathon, it means shaving off 9 minutes off their final time ! That is not a marginal gain, that is a stratospheric one.
The New York Times has recently published a deep analysis about the Vaporfly and the relationship with increased marathoner performances over the past years, raising questions about whether World Athletic would ban the shoes in a near future. My opinion is that it will never happen — we're talking about Nike here — but they will eventually limit the drop height of the shoes to limit the number of components that can fit under the sole. In that sense the coming up AlphaFly Next% model should be the last unrestricted model coming from the Swoosh. Time will tell, but for now forget about the $275 price and grab your pair.
Treadmill is for sure a good discussion topic among runners as it will not leave anybody indifferent. I actually truly hated it until a year or so ago; it was like torture to me every time I had to get on it. Then Zwift — I really should have bought shares in the company while it was cheap, damn — released a run version of the software, allowing you to run into in their virtual worlds while being on the treadmill. As a geek, I couldn't resist trying it for a while and it actually helped to at least give a chance to see the opportunity of running inside and its great advantages :
That is for the pros, and I wouldn't be honest if I didn't talk about the stuff weigh against treadmills :
Nowadays, I'm doing 70% of my training on the treadmill. And over time, I've learnt something else essential to be productive on it. When you run inside, most of the time in a gym I guess, you're already running in hot conditions for your body with most room temperatures around 23 degrees Celsius and humidity above 70%. We talked earlier of the impact of temperature on the run, but what I've not said yet is that in such conditions, your skin blood vessels will dilate, thus needing more blood flow to help the skin release some part of the heat produced. So when this happens, and as your amount of blood available is not infinitely available, less blood is available for the rest of the body, including what matters in our case : leg muscles. This is something you will definitely feel on a treadmill after a few minutes when you won't have any airflow to cool you down forcing your body to heat up.
There is actually a way to translate outside rate of perceived exertion to inside running, thanks to elite running endurance coach Steve Palladino and his Palladino Power Project. He wrote recently a meaningful article to sort this question; it's a must-read if you have some spare time. In case you don't, I've written below a formula that will most likely work in 90% of treadmill environment :
Treadmill FTP = Outside FTP X 0.96 (Air resistance) X 0.985 (Heat & Humidity)
Please note this is specifically working with power, and can't really being applied to speed for the pace issues already mentioned above.
« Ah shit, here we go again. » That's what some of you may be thinking right now about my power obsession. « Fair enough » I would answer. Using running power for the past year and a half, I've seen its community and resources grow a lot. Groups like Stryd Community or Palladino Power Project, specifically address power training plans, books like the ones of Jim Vance3Run with power - Jim Vance or Hans van Dijk & Ron van Megen4The Secrets of Running - Hans van Dijk & Ron van Megen. It's absolutely fascinating to witness the birth of a tool that most runners will use in 10 years or less from now.
As discussed previously in the Data chapter, I'm working with Stryd, this one being the most advanced and accurate on the market right now, taking account also of the wind which is truly a game changer when it comes to pacing your effort. I've also been trying Garmin products, but even though a lover of the brand, I recognize that they are behind, no question for now. Stryd costs a fair amount of money with a displayed price of $270, but that's what it takes to get a premium product for outside and inside running that can dramatically help to track a lot of stuff :
RE = (m/s) / (W/G)
. So it will rely on your running form including stride length, impact time, cadence, vertical oscillation, etc... If you're interested in that topic, please head to this Palladino Power Project article to learn more about.VO2 Max = (W/KG FTP*1,40)*10
.Looking back, my skyrocket progress on the run started the day I bought the power meter, clipped it on my shoe, and used power as my most important data. Looking at the number of PR's broken by random runners using power as a training and racing tool; no question it's game changer.
Still, to make the most out of your Stryd I've learnt a few tips and tricks over time :
If you plan to make the move to power anytime soon, you will need to add some extra features on your watch to read and record power, that data being native only on latest Vantage Polar models as I wrote. As a Garmin user, I had to add some ConnectIQ data fields, the first one being the official Stryd to write power into the activity file. The second is one is to display power in a more friendly way, and after a lot of tests, I went with DataRun Premium by Joop Verdoorn.
When it comes to training, I use 6 metrics :
This is very useful when it comes to working on my running form and technique and gathering all the data that matters. My setup for a race is really different though for the 6 metrics :
I also add auto lap function to the Garmin for every kilometre, allowing me to know lap pace and overall distance and time.
Dealing with such a crazy thing like IronMan, we could easily forget that running an open marathon at the maximum of our capacity is truly an extreme effort in itself. « If you want to win something, run 100 metres. If you want to experience something, run a marathon. » answered Emil Zatopek one day, a legendary Czechoslovakian runner back in the 50's.
Marathon difficulty lies around the 30 kilometre marks, when runners will start to “hit the wall” mainly due to the exhaustion of glucose and glycogen stores, meaning the body will have to fuel itself with fatty acids. The problem is that conversion of fatty acids will require way more oxygen, thus causing the legs to produce far less power. This is where body weight management and nutrition can play a significant part to delay the wall as long as possible, but I will discuss it in the dedicated Nutrition & hydration chapter.
Even though I've completed only one season of triathlon, and can't rely on long term data, I'm sure running an open marathon early in the season definitely helped me to deliver in the IronMan 140.6 marathon. I've done it at the limit of my physical endurance, breaking the #SUB3 mark and barely walking for the next 3 days. To be honest looking backward, I consider it a more difficult effort than both IronMan 140.6, because the traumatic stress you put on your legs at 92% of your FTP is just brutal. Really brutal. When I went on the IronMan 140.6 run, I wouldn't say it looked easy because it sure wasn't, but running it at just 81% of my FTP suddenly felt way more comfortable.
Bike training is difficult to fit in a training schedule because it's mostly about volume, spending hours on the bike. Run training is on another level altough most of the training for an IronMan 140.6 will likely be short — even for a #SUB10 performance — it will still be traumatic on your body due to ground contact.
Over the course of my season I've tried and adjusted plenty of small things to improve my training efficiency on the run. The motto I've tried to keep in mind the whole time was « the more various the stimulus sent to my body, the better » to make sure I was training all systems, from marathon pace to fatigue resistance and lactate threshold battle.
Below is the type and number of runs I was doing on average, from most demanding to least demanding in my opinion :
At last but not least, every training you're doing should be an opportunity to improve your running efficiency. I've talked about it earlier in the power section, but yeah... it's so much worth it to work on the running form. Avoiding heel strike pattern, using arms to support the movement, handling short ground contact, etc... For a marathon the delta can easily be more than 10 minutes between two runners of the same level but not handling the same running effectiveness. If you need a concrete example, aiming for a 3:30:00 marathon and therefore running at 12km/h, you can reduce your energy cost flight phase from 27% to 18% moving from 160 to 180 steps per minute !