As you surely have understood by now, most of my knowledge is coming from the Internet. There are quite a lot of interesting things out there, from articles to forums and groups. I can't remember where I read it, but I once saw someone saying that trying somehow confidently to get a #SUB10 required to do at least 4,000 kilometres of bike for a 16-week training block prior to the attempt, so an average of 35 kilometres per day. Based on my personal experience and kilometres rode in training, I can acknowledge it's certainly true. Looking back at my debut in the triathlon, I was not realising how the bike was really the most important thing. Whatever the race distance, you'll always spend half your time on the saddle. That should reflect heavily in your training.
Chasing the #SUB10, being really good on the bike is not an option, and I hope the list of notes you will find below will help you to enter or improve into that category.
Is it because I love being on my own ? This would be surely up for discussion, but I still deeply believe that riding alone is key when it comes to long-distance triathlon success on the bike. Without getting too deep, i can immediately see 3 reasons pushing for this :
Following these reasons, I can only count one hand the number of rides I did with someone else during that year. Three of them were during a 3-day bike boot camp to build a lot of fatigue over fatigue, one a week after my IronMan Switzerland because there was absolutely nothing at stake apart getting back on the bike, and another one the last week before Challenge Almere-Amsterdam because the job was done and it was a reward to myself.
To give a point of comparison, I'm following a 70.3 triathlete for years, doing around 70% of their ride — especially the long ones — in a group. He's clearly a better cyclist than I am, and is breaking me no question in a 70.3 by at least 10 minutes. But when it comes to the 140.6 distance, he had the edge for only a minute on our respective latest race ! This is, and I'm sure of it, because I learnt to build a world of my own capacity to handle the pacing effort and mental strength needed over the loneliness course of 180 kilometres. Something he hasn't trained enough alone.
Talking about the FTP — Functional Threshold Power, the maximum power you can sustain for an hour — is a common thing among cyclists, and I surely don't need to get more into it. However, the MAP — Maximum Aerobic Power — is not something I'm hearing a lot about, but it can play a great role in your path to improvement. The MAP is basically your athlete's O2 max on the bike, the power produced at VO2 maximum. It can't be maintained usually for more than a minute at the end of a ramp test, where the power output you produce is required to increase throughout the test. Another interesting data you can obtain from this test is your mean maximal 5 minutes power. The test's intensity usually does a good job forcing you to produce a high 5 minutes power in the last stages of the test. Typically, a rider's best 5 minutes power should be around 90% of his MAP using the ramp test.
That being said, why is it so important to have a look at it ? As I've said over and over, endurance sports are all about oxygen. When you're training the right way, you increase both the amount of oxygen you can use and the amount of power you can produce with that oxygen. The first being the MAP, and underneath that value is your ability to produce sustainable power through FTP. In a picturesque manner, it's like having a car where your MAP would be your maximum horsepower, and your FTP the % of that power you can use on a long-time effort. MAP is an an indicator of the aerobic ceiling and it gives some clues as to whether working on lifting the roof is needed, or whether one can just continue climbing the FTP ladder. To know exactly where you range, you can use a FTP:MAP ratio using your best P20:P6 values on TrainingPeaks. To give some insights on where you rank among others, typically FTP falls in the range of 70-80% of MAP; some of the best athletes out there can even get close to 90% ! So the lower the need to work your FTP, the higher the need to work on your MAP.
The best way to improve in that field is surprisingly done through long rides done at a relatively low intensity, most recent studies say. The thing is that if you ever get injured or ill, the fitness progress made through a good base built up will last longer than short, high-intensity training. Problem is, you need a hell of time to fit in long rides, or enough of them. I couldn't afford it, so I went the higher intensity training way.
Cadence has always been a highly disputed topic in the world of cycling. I won't start a thread about it, but to make everybody happy out there, i think there is simply no ideal cadence that works for all cyclists. But what is for sure, there is one that's more efficient when it comes to long-distance triathlon, and it all lies in the upper range.
Spinning or mashing on the pedals, both ways will make your bike move forward. But not with the same muscles. Slow cadence will require the use of your fast-twitching muscles while fast cadence will rely on the slow-twitching muscles. Wait, what did you say, I'm not a doctor ! Me neither, so to avoid some Google session, slow-twitch muscles help enable long-endurance feats such as distance running, while fast-twitch muscles fatigue faster but are used in powerful bursts of movements like sprinting.
As you should be able to relate on your own, on long-distance triathlon you want to avoid as much as possible the use of fast-twitch ones, the most powerful but lowest in endurance. Here comes the choice of a fast-spinning revolution, as at equal power output, a higher cadence requires less muscular force per revolution, therefore relying more on your slow-twitch muscles and cardiovascular system.
So I can safely assure you that high cadence on the bike = more fresh on the run ! Working in the long term to be able to produce a 90 rpm to 95 rpm over the course of a 180 kilometres bike ride is something I tried to aim for over the season. I still fell short on my #SUB10 with an average of 87 rpm, but it still surely already help to reduce my carbohydrate energy consumption.
One of the biggest problems athletes have when it comes to training is pacing themselves during an interval, and I don't exclude myself from that fact. I often start strong, then lactate gets into my legs and I have to focus on the effort while checking if the power output is right; it's just too much to process mentally. The latest generation of smart trainers are incredible when it comes to solving this problem with features like ERG.
ERG mode is a function to control your power output in a steady way, by forcing you to ride at a given power by adjusting the resistance of the bike trainer, regardless of your cadence or your gearing selection. If you have let's say a 20-minute set to do at 200 watts, all you have is to pedal. Whether it's 70 rpm or 90 rpm, it will deliver a consistent 200 watts power output, allowing you to complete workouts exactly as they are intended. This is a game changer.
Still, I can see two cons against ERG mode :
Use ERG mode for your key intervals session, but not for everything.
The first time I went on a bike was because of a good friend spamming Instagram stories of him riding indoor on something that was sounding like a video game. Most of you already know what I'm talking about : Zwift. I always have been a gamer by heart, and most of my childhood was about spamming the PlayStation. So when I discovered this virtual cycling — and later on running — software allowing you to ride with thousands of people from all over the world straight from your comfy home... oh, boy ! That was exactly in February 2018, I was injured and couldn't run, so I went to a local bike shop that had a Zwift setup ready. I did a 45-minute ride there, and all it took me to order a home trainer and find a used bike was the time needed to get back home. Only later I realised it was maybe that decision to ride indoor that allowed me to make so much fitness improvements in such a short amount of time.
I roughly did 80% of all my yearly rides on the home trainer. That's a total of 10 000 kilometres inside for the whole season, so I'll let you do the maths on how many litres of sweat went on my floor. Getting out of the bed in the morning, taking a shower to get the blood flowing, grabbing an espresso, putting on bib shorts, powering on the home trainer, starting the workout. It took me exactly 30 minutes to proceed with this morning routine, without having to worry about the tyre pressure, outside weather, being too cold, being too hot, dealing with traffic, stopping at traffic lights, repairing a puncture, not being able to push on the pedal because you're downhill having to coast... And the list could go on and on. Riding the trainer is a godsend to any athlete taking their training seriously, looking to be efficient and safe.
When your time is limited by a job and/or a family, it's so patently obvious to make key bike sessions indoor nowadays that I don't understand not doing it. I still rode outside from time to time in the South of France, where my parents are living, and it was every single time a wonderful experience. But to be fair, I knew while doing them outside that I wasn't as effective as I could have been inside. Stopping to take pictures, or to grab some more water, dealing with some traffic... But it was okay because it was more about pedaling and learning to deal with fatigue than raising FTP with key 3x15 minute sessions that shouldn't be interrupted.
Last but not least, you will surely notice over time that riding inside is more difficult than riding outside. One of the main reasons, if not the main, is because of the way your body is moving. As your bike is locked to the home trainer, your upper body movement will be limited due to this. You just can't throw the bike from side to side as you would do outside to shift your weight out of the saddle by taking advantage of gravity. This has a substantial impact on your effort as upper body strength is used outdoors to help provide more power and give the lower body time to recover during hard efforts.
Moving deeply into the Zwift universe, I met a lot of virtual friends, some of them racing a lot on the platform. I was truly amazed because 3 times per week, they were going full ham in a 60-minutes race and were able to repeat the same effort 48 hours later. This is something they wouldn't be able to do on the run, with so many traumas associated with ground contact.
This story is leading to something simple : don't waste your time, ride hard.
I was usually riding 4 times a week, and despite falling on the floor straight after, I was able to produce a second workout the same day after some rest and a good recovery meal. When you take a closer look at my IF over the course of the season, I average a 0.74 IF, which is pretty solid if you consider it includes warm up and cool down.
So how was I dividing my training week on the bike ? It was an immutable process with 2 rides to improve FTP and/or MAP, and 2 rides to improve endurance.
This left me with 5 simple workouts to integrate into my schedule :
As being on the bike was a little bit more than half of my training time, I would usually spend 7 hours to 8 hours a week on that discipline. If done right, that's vastly enough to make incredible gains, as I went in just 5 months from an FTP of 211 watts — 3 W/KG to a FTP of 284 watts — 4.12 W/KG !
Just before starting my training in September 2018, I had a lunch with a friend of a friend who did an IronMan a few weeks earlier. I had never met him before, but as I have a thirst for knowledge, it was interesting to have his insights. I remember he told me to be ready to tackle a long endurance ride of 5 hours or more on the bike on the Sunday. There is something in the air about that kind of long endurance ride to prepare body & mind for the distance. Well, I may be up for a head-on opposition with many coaches there, but with my experience over a year trying different things, I think those kind of rides are useless for 99% of triathletes. That last one per cent missing being pros and age group athletes aiming for Kona, who are in a completely different universe to others, even those like us chasing #SUB10.
It took me quite a time to understand this, and I had my share of long rides before acknowledging that a long ride of 4 hours or more induced a significant training load and fatigue on my body, eventually impacting too much my training in the following days. It's just not worth it.
If you consider your weekly long ride has to be followed by a brick run adding on top TSS, anything between 3 hours and 3h30 will be vastly enough to get the job done. It doesn't mean that you can't from time to time go further, but it should in my opinion happen in these two cases :
For the record, I did slightly different before Challenge Almere-Amsterdam and my #SUB10 attempt as I went for a 2-day bike boot camp in the Alps 3 weeks prior to the race, which was actually at the very beginning of the peak phase. So no need to do another long ride 2 weeks before, with such a short time I was simply aiming to be fresh.
When I jumped on my bike at Challenge Almere-Amsterdam to go through the 180 kilometres, and went down on my aero bars, it was the first time I was doing this action since IronMan Switzerland 7 weeks ago. But for the whole ride — completely flat — I never had to sit up because it was not sustainable for my body.
Keeping an aero position is not easy because it's everything but natural to the body, asking a lot of your abs and your back. When I started the training in September 2018, I had incredible difficulties to keep this position for more than 20 minutes. In fact, I had to deal with a reluctant trapezius muscle and it took me over 6 months and a lot of time at the osteopath and at the bike store for fitting to unlock it, and finally be able to keep that position for hours. But from that day, I never spent much time working on it. Some would argue it's a shame because there is aero position and aero position, and I could have worked harder on getting my arms the closest possible from my body to get a lower aerodynamic drag. That's right, my captain, but at some point on my first year of triathlon I had a dozen of things to deal with in order to improve, and so i made the choice to keep a okay position and save improvements for a potential another journey in a few years.
So don't think that you have to make all your endurance rides in aero position to be successful on race day. If you know you can keep it, and you have a standard road bike, just ride it and take advantage of the beautiful landscapes around.
This is probably the part of the blog I'm the most uncomfortable with, because it's all about the money you can throw at your bike. Speed is something you can buy in a long-distance triathlon, and I bought some as you saw in the Equipment chapter.
Still, apart if you're born with pedals under your feet, or with a strong prior experience in riding, an aero bike seems to be mandatory to a #SUB10 performance. As a non-drafting race *cough*, up, down, flat or turning, we are always pushing our own way through the wind. Therefore, aerodynamics trumps weight in our sport.
Without breaking the bank, there is still a lot you can do to improve your aero drag and save a lot of seconds by the end of the bike leg :
So when you list all this, we obviously can't make a straight sum — it's not that simple — but we can easily think it's possible to save at least 50 watts (!!!) for a budget of around 800 USD. That's 20 minutes on an IronMan 140.6 bike leg, I will let that sink in there as a conclusion.